The government of Keir Starmer does not get any business. Ignore the pre-election hush-hush about cozying up to business and the £63 billion in promises made at the investment summit in October 2024.

Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, and Starmer have no idea how to carry out the growth mission. Labour wants to end industrial conflict and prioritize working people.

However, it comes at the price of British corporations.

The dissonance of the CBI, which has warned that Britain is facing a ‘recession made in Downing Street’, needs to be taken seriously. 

The lack of understanding goes beyond the deeply regressive £25billion rise in employers’ National Insurance Contributions. 

It is reflected in the raw decisions with which every government confronts commerce.

Nationalising the railways may appeal to aggressive and well-remunerated railwaymen. 

But unnecessarily putting the whole network on the national balance sheet will never make the trains run on time. 

Naivety and ignorance have been on display in the Government’s handling of the sale of Royal Mail-owner International Distribution Services to Daniel Kretinsky. 

The Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds ignored the fact that his wealth derives from his part-ownership of pipelines delivering fuel from President Putin’s Russia to Europe. 

Dealing with Gazprom requires the beneficiary of the trade to visit the Kremlin and pay obeisance. 

What is more worrying, in terms of Labour’s future dealings with business, is its failure to ask the simplest questions about Daniel Kretinsky’s £3.6billion bid. 

Everyone has skin in the game except the people who really matter. 

These are the end-users in homes and offices across the nation. 

The bankers who have assembled some £3billion of loans for the deal are not in the least bit interested in whether the Universal Service Obligation is met, they just want the interest paid. 

Other UK firms which have allowed the debt to pile up, including such problem firms as Thames Water and grocer Asda, have found themselves in deep difficulty. 

Workers for the Royal Mail may believe they have secured a gold-plated deal for the next five years. 

History tells us there is no such thing. When costs are too high and there is a fiscal problem of some kind, workplace deals are ruthlessly abrogated. 

City bankers, advisers and consultants will already be enjoying skiing holidays or the luxury of St Barts in the Caribbean in anticipation of the potential of £146million in fees coming their way. 

What Jonathan Reynolds and the board of Royal Mail-owner International Distributions Services should be asking is: why is Kretinsky so keen? 

Fast-growing Global Logistics Services, the European offshoot, is a jewel in the crown to be offloaded at a high price. 

IDS sits on freehold property, including valuable central London development sites such as King’s Cross, worth £1.8billion. 

Maximising assets through development and sale-and-lease back will be a priority. Last is the Ofcom review. 

If it amends the Universal Service sufficiently, the Royal Mail, despite falling postal volumes, could become a profit gusher depriving existing shareholders (including union members) of income which should be theirs. 

The failure to probe these issues, any of which could stop the sale of a ‘royal’ brand far more embedded than Cadbury, is a gross dereliction. It will come to haunt Reynolds and Labour.