Amidst the UK government's push for a Brexit 'reset' with the European Union, a significant new demand from the bloc has emerged that is likely to delight Remain supporters and potentially complicate upcoming negotiations. The EU is reportedly insisting that Britain rejoin the Erasmus student exchange scheme as part of a broader package aimed at improving trade, defence, and security ties.
The 'reset' is being pursued by Prime Minister [Insert Current PM's Name, if known, otherwise refer to "the Prime Minister"] ahead of a crucial summit in London scheduled for May 19th, where a new UK-EU partnership is intended to be unveiled. European relations minister Nick Thomas-Symonds has confirmed that the government is exploring a deal to facilitate youth mobility between the UK and EU member states. However, sources indicate that Downing Street is currently resistant to a full return to the Erasmus programme.
A diplomatic source within the EU revealed to [Source Newspaper Name, if mentioned, otherwise "reports"] that a substantial number of member states are strongly advocating for the Erasmus demand. This stance reportedly stems from frustrations within the bloc regarding the UK's approach to proposals for a wider youth mobility scheme. According to these reports, the EU's insistence on Erasmus membership signifies a hardening of their conditions in the ongoing negotiations with Britain.
One of the key sticking points in discussions surrounding youth mobility has been the EU's desire for guarantees that its students would pay the same tuition fees as domestic UK students. An EU diplomat told The Telegraph that Erasmus "has become key for a large number of member states," adding that the UK is "pushing back on Erasmus [membership]... they only want youth mobility with caps for now."
These demands could pose a significant challenge to the government's plans for the May 19th summit, where leaders hope to announce breakthroughs in various sectors, including animal health and fisheries, alongside any broader agreement on youth mobility.
Confirmation of the government's consideration of a youth mobility deal has already triggered a sharp backlash from Conservative and Reform UK figures. Tory Shadow Business and Trade Secretary Andrew Griffith accused Labour of pursuing a youth mobility scheme "by the back door," labeling Keir Starmer an "arch-Remainer" seeking to "cosy up to his beloved EU." Reform MP Lee Anderson echoed this sentiment, accusing the Labour government of disregarding the British public and opening the borders further.
Conversely, the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) has advocated for a "balanced youth mobility scheme" encompassing school visits, exchanges, and time-limited work opportunities for young people. However, John Longworth, former director-general of the BCC and now chair of the Independent Business Network, cautioned that such a scheme could lead to a surge in immigration.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Minister Thomas-Symonds defended the concept of a "smart, controlled youth mobility scheme," highlighting existing similar agreements with Australia and Uruguay as examples that do not equate to freedom of movement. When questioned about potential backlash, he asserted that the government has a "strong mandate from the British people" for a forward-looking approach to EU relations, moving beyond the debates of the past.
Furthermore, the government has indicated a willingness to align with EU standards on food and animal welfare, with Mr. Thomas-Symonds stating they are "not interested" in a "race to the bottom on standards." While he noted that "sensible EU proposals" on youth mobility, including potential time limits and caps, would be considered, the inclusion of Erasmus as a key EU demand adds a new layer of complexity to the ongoing Brexit 'reset' talks.