A damning report from the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has revealed significant failings within Tower Hamlets Council, which has been ordered to pay a mother over £5,000 for its mishandling of her child's special educational needs. The case, which has drawn public attention to the council's systemic shortcomings, exposes a pattern of poor communication, negligence, and a disregard for legal obligations that caused a family "avoidable distress" and "uncertainty."
The ombudsman's investigation concluded that the council failed to provide suitable education for a child, referred to as "Child Y," for approximately two academic terms. This failure directly violated the child's Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP), a crucial legal document that outlines the specific support a child with special needs is entitled to. The report details how the council's incompetence led to a breakdown in support, leaving the child without essential services like online education, specialist maths and science tuition, and touch-typing training.
A Timeline of Negligence-The timeline of events, pieced together from the ombudsman's report and further investigation, paints a picture of a bureaucracy riddled with inaction and miscommunication.
October 2022: The mother, "Miss X," first contacted the council to express concerns that her child was not receiving the required support from the online school. Her concerns were met with silence after her primary contact at the council became "unavailable."
January 2023: After months of persistent attempts, the council finally responded to Miss X's inquiries. However, this action was followed by further months of inaction as they awaited information from the school.
Mid-2023: Facing continuous delays and confusion, Miss X took matters into her own hands. She enrolled Child Y in a new online school and personally covered the costs. She also lodged an official complaint with the council, but it was mishandled and not escalated properly, prolonging the family's ordeal.
June 2023: The council finally agreed to pay for the new school's fees directly, but failed to arrange for all the additional support mandated by the EHCP, leaving the child still without full services.
March 2024: The council issued a new response, acknowledging its failures and poor communication. However, as Miss X reported, this acknowledgment did not lead to immediate change, with further delays in payments and a failure to follow through on all agreed actions.
The Financial and Human Cost-The ombudsman's ruling is a stark measure of the damage caused by the council's inaction. The total penalty of £5,000 is broken down to specifically address the various forms of harm inflicted:
£2,700 for the child's missed education.
£1,600 for the missed extra support.
£250 for the "distress and uncertainty" caused by the delays.
£250 for the "time and trouble" Miss X endured in trying to resolve the issue.
£750 for the "distress, frustration and uncertainty" caused by the council's overall failures.
The ombudsman has mandated that the payments for missed education and support be used for the child's future educational benefit, a necessary step to mitigate the long-term impact of the council's negligence.
Council's Response: A Vague Apology and Defensive Stance-When confronted with questions about the causes of the delays and poor communication, a spokesperson for Tower Hamlets Council offered a generic apology. "We fully accept the report and its findings, and we apologise to Miss X for the uncertainty, upset and delays we caused her and her family," they stated. They claimed to have put "actions in place to address the shortcomings" and that their team is "working hard to improve."
However, this apology is contradicted by a defensive statement that followed, where the council referenced a "very recent Ofsted and CQC Send inspection" that "praised the range and quality of support for children and their families." This attempt to deflect from the specific failures highlighted by the ombudsman has been met with skepticism and raises questions about the council's true commitment to reform. The case serves as a powerful reminder that behind the bureaucratic jargon and public relations, real families are suffering due to a system that consistently fails to meet its most basic obligations.
The failings of Tower Hamlets Council have a disproportionate impact on the British Bangladeshi community, which constitutes the largest single ethnic group in the borough, at over a third of the population. Critics have pointed to a history of leadership instability and governance issues under various administrations, including the current one led by Mayor Lutfur Rahman, suggesting these problems are not new.
Source- My London