.jpg)
.svg)
A simmering national frustration over immigration and housing has boiled over in the town of Waterlooville, where residents are protesting government plans to house up to 35 asylum seekers in newly built flats. The demonstration has become a national flashpoint, pitting local communities against a controversial government policy aimed at reducing the soaring costs of hotel accommodation for migrants.
On Wednesday night, nearly 2,000 Waterlooville residents took to the streets in a silent protest outside the Waterloo House flats. Their chants of 'send them home' echoed a deep-seated anger that has been building for years. The core of their resentment lies in the perceived injustice of a system that they say prioritizes newly arrived asylum seekers over local British families who have been on social housing waiting lists for years.
The flats in question, valued at approximately £250,000 each, are set to be used as dispersal housing for supported asylum seekers. This move, however, is being widely condemned as a "slap in the face" to local residents, with one protestor lamenting the decline of the high street and the rise in homelessness and unemployment in the area.
Braverman Leads the Backlash as Council Urges Calm
The protest has found a powerful champion in former Home Secretary Suella Braverman, the local MP. She has launched a petition against the plan, which has already amassed over 8,000 signatures. Braverman, who has been a vocal critic of the government's handling of the migrant crisis, took to social media to praise the peaceful nature of the demonstration, saying, "You're not far-right. You just love our country and are willing to stand up for it."
In a public letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, Braverman lambasted the plan as "insulting to local people" and warned that such facilities could turn high streets into "no-go zones for the patriotic, common-sense majority."
Meanwhile, Havant Borough Council is attempting to provide factual clarity and de-escalate tensions. The council leader, Phil Munday, has pushed back against what he calls "inaccurate language" from Braverman, clarifying that the individuals to be housed are not a large group of single adult males, as some have feared, but are "best suited for the use of couples, or single parents with young children." The council has also confirmed it will submit feedback to the Home Office reflecting public concern as the consultation period ends.
A National Problem with Local Fallout
The Waterlooville protest is a microcosm of a much larger national crisis. While asylum seekers are not eligible for traditional social housing, the government’s reliance on dispersal housing has created an optics problem that is fueling public discontent. According to recent data, over 1.3 million households in England are currently on social housing waiting lists, a figure that has increased by 10% in the last two years. The net loss of social homes continues to outpace new construction, and some families face waiting times of a decade or more.
The government's shift away from hotels is a direct response to a spiraling financial burden. The Home Office was spending an estimated £8 million a day on hotel accommodation for over 32,000 asylum seekers, a cost that has been widely criticized as unsustainable. To cut these costs, the government is accelerating the use of dispersal housing, placing asylum seekers in residential properties managed by contractors under guaranteed rent schemes.
This new policy, however, is not without its own set of problems. Critics worry it could negatively impact local rental markets by giving landlords a financial incentive to prioritize fixed-rate contracts for asylum seekers over traditional tenants. Furthermore, a new 'Failure to Travel' policy, which removes housing and financial support from single adult male asylum seekers who refuse to relocate from hotels, has been introduced to expedite the process, but also raises concerns about the welfare of those affected.
The situation in Waterlooville is far from over. As the public consultation period on the Waterloo House flats concludes, the Home Office faces a difficult decision. It must choose whether to proceed with a national strategy that is causing significant local backlash or to reconsider its approach in response to growing domestic frustrations. The outcome will set a precedent for countless other British communities grappling with a housing crisis that is increasingly intertwined with the complexities of migration policy.
