.svg)
A storm is brewing in the automotive world as new car tax rules threaten to throw a wrench into the UK's ambitious electric vehicle (EV) transition. Critics argue that the changes, designed to bring EVs into line with petrol and diesel vehicles, will ultimately "discourage" drivers from making the switch, jeopardizing crucial climate goals.
For years, EVs have enjoyed significant tax advantages, acting as a powerful incentive for consumers to embrace cleaner transportation. However, the government's recent announcement signals a shift in policy, introducing Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) and company car tax for electric vehicles.
The Changes at a Glance:
VED Introduction: From April 2025, newly registered EVs will be subject to VED, mirroring the current system for petrol and diesel cars. This means EV owners will pay an annual road tax, ending the current exemption.
Expensive EV Supplement: EVs with a list price exceeding £40,000 will also face the expensive car supplement, adding further financial burden.
Company Car Tax: From April 2025, company car tax rates for EVs will also begin to rise, gradually increasing over the following years.
Why the Concern?
While the government argues that these changes are necessary to ensure fairness and generate revenue, industry experts and environmental groups are voicing strong opposition. Their primary concerns revolve around:
Reduced Affordability: The introduction of VED and company car tax will increase the overall cost of EV ownership, potentially deterring potential buyers, especially those on tighter budgets.
Slowing the Transition: Critics argue that the changes could significantly slow down the pace of EV adoption, hindering the UK's progress towards its net-zero emissions targets.
Uncertainty for Consumers: The shifting tax landscape creates uncertainty for consumers, making it harder for them to make informed decisions about their next vehicle purchase.
The Ripple Effect:
The impact of these tax changes could extend beyond individual consumers. Car manufacturers, who have invested heavily in EV development, may see a slowdown in sales, potentially impacting future investment. The used EV market could also be affected, as the increased cost of new EVs may influence resale values.
A Call for Reconsideration:
Many are now calling on the government to reconsider its approach, urging for a more balanced strategy that supports the continued growth of the EV market. Suggestions include:
- Phased implementation of tax changes to allow for a smoother transition.
- Continued incentives for lower-income households to make the switch.
- Increased investment in charging infrastructure to address range anxiety.
The debate surrounding these new car tax rules highlights the complex challenges of balancing environmental goals with economic considerations. As the UK navigates its journey towards a greener future, finding the right policy framework will be crucial in ensuring a successful and equitable transition to electric motoring.
Drivers opting for an electric vehicle (EV) instead of a petrol or diesel model will be three times more likely to be affected by the luxury car tax under upcoming rule changes, new data suggests.
According to research by online vehicle marketplace Auto Trader, these tax changes could discourage people from transitioning to electric cars. The company has called for a delay in the planned update to vehicle excise duty (VED), which will see electric cars lose their exemption from April 1.
From that date, all EV owners will be required to pay at least the standard VED rate, which will be set at £195 annually from the second year after registration.
Additionally, owners of newly registered vehicles priced over £40,000 will also be subject to the expensive car supplement, commonly referred to as the luxury car tax. This will cost £425 per year from the second to sixth year after registration.
These policy changes were originally introduced in November 2022 by then-Chancellor Jeremy Hunt under the Conservative government, with the stated aim of making the UK’s motoring tax system fairer. The Labour government is continuing with the policy.
Due to the high cost of battery production, EVs are often more expensive than petrol or diesel cars. Auto Trader found that 56% of electric cars up to five years old listed on its platform have a price tag exceeding £40,000, compared to just 16% of petrol or diesel vehicles in the same age range.
Ian Plummer, Auto Trader’s commercial director, criticized the move, arguing that consumers should not be given additional reasons to avoid switching to electric vehicles.
"Despite global economic uncertainty, it would be sensible to delay these tax increases to avoid discouraging EV adoption for what is ultimately a marginal revenue gain for the Treasury," he said.
He also noted that electric cars up to five years old are three-and-a-half times more likely to be subject to the luxury car tax than equivalent petrol or diesel models, which could undermine efforts to promote EV adoption.
Under the UK’s zero-emission vehicles (ZEV) mandate, at least 28% of all new cars sold this year must be zero-emission, primarily meaning fully electric. In February, the market share for pure EVs stood at 25.3%.
Manufacturers failing to meet these targets—without using flexibilities such as purchasing credits from compliant companies or boosting future EV sales—could face fines of £15,000 per polluting vehicle sold above the limit. The government is currently reviewing feedback from a consultation on potential adjustments to these regulations, which may include making it easier for non-compliant manufacturers to avoid penalties.
Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, suggested that the Treasury’s rationale for the expensive car supplement is that anyone spending over £40,000 on a car should be able to afford additional taxation. However, he expressed doubts about the impact on used car buyers, as vehicle values tend to depreciate significantly within the first few years.
“There’s a risk that the expensive car supplement is having an unintended consequence at a time when there’s pressure to make used EVs more attractive as part of the transition to greener motoring,” he said.
Quentin Willson, founder of FairCharge and an advisory board member of EVUK, strongly opposed the policy, arguing that it discourages private buyers.
"Charging £620 a year to tax most EVs will deter consumers, who already receive no incentive to switch from combustion engines," he said. "Ministers encourage EV adoption, yet the Treasury is putting up tax barriers—this is not smart policymaking."
A Treasury spokesperson defended the changes, stating:
"The transition to electric vehicles is vital for economic growth and tackling climate change. Our approach ensures fiscal stability while supporting EV adoption, including the introduction of vehicle excise duty on EVs from April 2025, alongside targeted incentives."
