.svg)
A recent employment tribunal has shed light on a challenging workplace dynamic at an Edinburgh dental clinic, resulting in a significant compensation award and raising important questions about communication and support in professional environments. The case involved former dental nurse Maureen Howieson, who was awarded £25,000 in a dispute with her former employer, Great Junction Dental Practice.
The tribunal heard from both sides, including dental practitioner Jisna Iqbal, and concluded that a series of misunderstandings and a "strained" professional relationship contributed to a "hostile working environment" for Ms. Howieson. The case highlights the difficult position of Mrs. Iqbal, who, as a qualified dentist from India, was working in a support role in the UK while awaiting eligibility to practice. This transition period, coupled with the daily pressures of the clinic, created a complex environment for both individuals involved.
According to the tribunal findings, the conflict escalated due to perceived "rude" and "belittling" behaviors from Mrs. Iqbal toward Ms. Howieson, including gestures like eye-rolling. While the tribunal accepted Ms. Howieson's version of events, it also acknowledged the complexities of the situation. The core of the issue appeared to be a breakdown in communication and a lack of intervention from the clinic's management, particularly when Ms. Howieson's concerns were first raised.
The situation came to a head in late 2024 when Ms. Howieson, who had been moved to reception duties due to her arthritis, had a panic attack at work. The tribunal found that the clinic’s management, despite being made aware of the escalating tensions, failed to take adequate action, which a judge described as an "unacceptable omission." This lack of a clear resolution was found to be a significant factor in Ms. Howieson's decision to resign, citing a final incident of an incorrect underpayment as the "final straw."
The clinic, while maintaining that Ms. Howieson’s role had not changed, was found by the panel to have acted in a manner that was "wholly at odds with the evidence." The tribunal's decision underscores the legal and ethical responsibility of employers to create and maintain a supportive work environment, and to address interpersonal conflicts promptly and effectively.
Since the tribunal’s decision, both the Great Junction Dental Practice and Mrs. Iqbal have been working to move forward. The clinic has reportedly undertaken a review of its internal communication and conflict resolution policies. While the professional and personal impact of the case has been significant for all involved, the outcome serves as a crucial reminder for all workplaces about the importance of empathy, clear communication, and the responsibility to support every member of a team, especially during periods of personal and professional transition.
Since the tribunal’s decision, the case has sparked a significant public discussion, with many readers sharing their own experiences with workplace conflict. Comments on online news platforms reveal a wide range of opinions, from those who see the verdict as a victory for employee rights to others who express cynicism about the compensation culture. One commenter, Eamonn Nijinsky, cynically suggested that the case could inspire a new scheme, writing, “a quick way to make money is to do a deal with a colleague to give you abuse, having agreed to split the subsequent proceeds.” Another, B Jones, shared a personal story, stating, "I was treated like this 30 plus years ago, isolated by another colleague for nearly a year. Supervisors did nothing. There were no real policies to help support then. Good things have changed." The commentary also touched on the ethnic backgrounds of those involved, with one person suggesting, "if it had been the other way around it would have been [racism]." This shows that the case has opened up a broader conversation about workplace dynamics, empathy, and the complexities of interpersonal relationships.
_2.jpg)
